Customer Service:
1-570-955-1438

Text Message for a Quote:
1-570-301-7456

Terry v. Ohio Legal Case Brief

In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), the Supreme Court created an exception to probable cause doctrine by allowing police to engage in the practice of temporarily detaining individuals for investigative stops and allowing protective frisking of individuals under limited circumstances.

Terry v. Ohio Legal Case Brief

The primary constitutional issue in Terry v. Ohio was whether the activities of police in the context of a stop and frisk was a violation of the Fourth Amendment that would prevent the introduction of any evidence seized in such activity at trail by operation of the exclusionary rule.  While the Constitution itself provides protection against unreasonable search and seizure, it offers no guidance as to the remedy that should be employed when a police official or other representative of the government oversteps the boundaries delineated in the constitution. In addition, the Constitution itself offers no guidance as to the standards that should be employed when determining if there has been a violation of constitutional principles, which have led the courts to develop standards.

Related Research Paper Topics

Exclusionary Rule Term Paper - Exclusionary Rule research papers often point out that it contrasts with the Fourteenth Amendment, in relation to the Constitution of the United States.

Public Video Surveillance - Public Video Surveillance papers will examine the uses of video surveillance and other visual technology by public and private entities to prevent and discourage crime, including law enforcement practices, and the associated legal and constitutional implications.

Freedom - Freedom research papers look at the differing parameters for what Freedom means to individuals and societies.

Miranda v. Arizona - Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), the Supreme Court articulated the procedural case of Miranda v. Arizona.