Right to Bear Arms
While research papers on the intent of the Second Amendment show that from a historical perspective, the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution seems to support an individual right to keep and bear arms. This right to bear arms research paper analysis is not the first, nor the last, attempt to interpret what our fore- fathers meant regarding the right “of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” From a constitutional purist’s standpoint, the language in the Second Amendment is straightforward: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” The phrase “right of the people” has significant meaning in this amendment, and throughout the Bill of Rights, since the phrase appears in other sections of the document that is interpreted as protecting individual rights. Thus, the second amendment protects the same sort of individual right that other parts of the Bill of Rights provide. The First Congress upholds that argument because it had strong influences and demands from proponents who believed in individual rights, to write amendments that would ensure the basic liberties of American citizens. So one should conclude that the second amendment’s right of the individual means just that: the intent was for any citizen to bear arms.
The language of the Second Amendment was adopted as part of the Bill of Rights to the Federal Constitution in 1791. A fact remains that the first ten amendments representing the view of the thirteen colonies that certain rights were fundamental to a free society, and should be guaranteed against government intrusion. The framers held a variety of position changes and interpretations of individual’s rights in the proposed Bill of Rights. With various drafts of the document that later became the center piece for our democracy, scholars can interpret and define and try to decipher any hidden meaning or intent to justify what James Madison meant about militia versus individual rights.